I guess I would say which is more important? Code contributions (if you're getting any from the license) / the ability to request those contributions or a bigger install base? I'm personally ok with any license except the GPL (now that's hard to get through legal).
Cheers, Tyler On 7/25/07, Geert Bevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > over the years I've had several discussions about the license that is > used by RIFE. It seems that a lot of people have problems getting LGPL > or CDDL through legal at their company. There are also quite some > developers that only want to work on Apache or BSD-style licenses. > > What do you think about RIFE's license. Should I change it to Apache 2? > > Geert > > -- > Geert Bevin > Terracotta - http://www.terracotta.org > Uwyn "Use what you need" - http://uwyn.com > RIFE Java application framework - http://rifers.org > Music and words - http://gbevin.com > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rife-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rife-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
