Yes.
I think we should have the best of the two, as wanted:
- separation of concern ( :-) I succeeded to place it!), i.e.
"pure" text: if xhtml tags are needed, then escape <>&" with
something like "\\"
- xhtml enabled: <>&"' as literals must be escaped with xhtml
entity references
How do you propose to indicate that the properties file should be
interpreted in xhtml enabled or disabled mode?
--
Geert Bevin Uwyn bvba
"Use what you need" Avenue de Scailmont 34
http://www.uwyn.com 7170 Manage, Belgium
gbevin[remove] at uwyn dot com Tel +32 64 84 80 03
PGP Fingerprint : 4E21 6399 CD9E A384 6619 719A C8F4 D40D 309F D6A9
Public PGP key : available at servers pgp.mit.edu, wwwkeys.pgp.net
_______________________________________________
Rife-users mailing list
Rife-users@uwyn.com
http://www.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
