Hello Sebastien, > Sebastien Bin <[email protected]> hat am 27. Februar 2018 > um 15:51 geschrieben: > > > Hello Anna > > We discussed a little bit about this yesterday and we will continue this > discussion during our stand up this morning I think. And we must discuss > with the whole team (not the case today)
yes, it will only be a sustainable solution, if has been made by the whole team. > > I think somebody will explain a future decision here. > > If we migrate it will take some time and it's not the first priority for > now, but I think we must discuss about this issue here. yes, migration does need time! great to hear that it will be something you have to discuss. > > > Thanks for your interest. > > Note: If you want some help to contribute with the current system, feel > free to send a mail here or come on the IRC channel on freenode. > > Have a nice day! Thank you! > > > On 02/27/2018 09:38 AM, Anna Marei wrote: > > Hello Maxim! > > > >> Maxim Cournoyer <[email protected]> hat am 26. Februar > >> 2018 um 21:16 geschrieben: > >> > >> > >> Hello Anna! > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> From: "Anna Marei" <[email protected]> > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2018 7:41:48 AM > >>> Subject: [Ring] Idea/Question: Refactoring your development > >>> Hello, I would like to contribute to the development of Ring. > >> Cool! > > Yeah ;) > > > >>> Unfortunately, Tuleap seems too chaotic and incomprehensible to me as an > >>> outsider. User stories, milestones and tasks are sometimes several years > >>> old > >>> and there is no roadmap or prioritization to identify them. > >> The only features of Tuleap currently actively used are the Wiki (see: > >> https://tuleap.ring.cx/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/ring/index.php?title=Main_Page) > >> the Bugs (see: https://tuleap.ring.cx/plugins/tracker/?tracker=15) and > >> Enhancements (see: https://tuleap.ring.cx/plugins/tracker/?tracker=17) > >> trackers. > >> > >>> In addition, the > >>> fourfold solution with Tuleap, Gerrit, Transifex and GitHub further > >>> enhances > >>> this chaos of development (for people from outside) of your actually great > >>> product. > >>> For example, a self-hosted instance of GitLab would be a very modern way > >>> of > >>> managing the entire production and review and translation process of > >>> software > >>> such as Ring under one roof. > >>> What do you think? > >>> Best regards > >> I agree the system is complex and heterogeneous. I'll try to bring your > >> ideas into a discussion with the core Ring developers. It is on our > >> roadmap to discuss how to improve the community aspects of Ring. > > Cool! When will you meet/discuss that topic? > > > >> Thank you for sharing your ideas about Ring! > >> > >> Maxim
