Hi Yihao, I'd just wait a couple more days since the email was sent on a Friday, and he might not have seen it yet.
Best, -Michael On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 4:32 PM, Yihao Jia <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Peter, > > Thanks for the help! > > I did send an email to Chris Amin ([email protected]), but there might be > some problem with my Gmail system and I cannot get his reply, or just > because he is busy these hours. > > I am sorry that I am in a hurry for this issue, and my research system > involves several parts and they work simultaneously, while the limit > regulation of RIPE atlas part fails the process of my whole system every > day. And I really need to deal with this. > > Since I haven't connected to Chris yet, could you help me ping him and > loop me back in any possible way? > > Thanks, > Yihao > > (below is the email I sent to Chris yesterday.) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Dear Chris, > > Thank for helping me! > > I am a Ph.D. student. The reason why I try to launch so many measurements > is just for research. > And I wish the rate limits could be > temporarily > > increased for 10 days, since I probably might > exceed > most of these rules. > > > Generally, my research is like this. > --- > Part 1. > I have 860 targets to ping, and thus 730 measurements. And for each > target, I would like to use a fixed set of 100 probes in the measurement. > For each of the measurement, I'd like the target to be Pinged by these 100 > probes on every 1 hour, and the measurement is planned to stop 12 hours > later after the measurement start. Thus, if one probe sent 3 packets at > each ping, the total credits will be 3,096,000 (730*12*100*3=3,096,000). > > Part 2. > This looks like a random measurement. My research is about an Internet > anomalies detection system. So every time my system triggers an alarm, (the > alarm would set for 1 of the 730 targets), I'd like to start an instant, > and probably one-off measurement from the previous 100 probes to the > alarmed target. The question is this anomalies detection system is still > under improvement, so I don't exactly know how many measurements might > concurrently be started at the same time. > --- > (The 730 targets are elaborately selected and necessary to me because I > need the dataset as many as possible to examine the accuracy of the system > ) > > > I check the rules at: https://atlas.ripe.net/docs/udm/#rate-limits > It makes me feel like I might exceed many rules intentionally > or unintentional. > Considering I am in a huge hurry to examine this system, I'd very like the > limits for these rules be temporarily increased. > > I appreciate every suggestion and help on this! > My RIPE atlas account is: [email protected] > > Many thanks, > Yihao > > > > > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 at 07:06, Peter Eckel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Jia, >> >> did you read the mail vom Chris Amin from yesterday? I guess that should >> answer everything. I'd get in touch with Chris and discuss the rest >> directly. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Peter. > > > > >
