ceejay Wrote: > I wondered about doing this, but figured that, since the encoding should > be entirely CPU bound, there wouldn't be much point in running multiple > encodings in parallel unless you have multiple CPUs. But you can still run _one_ in the background so that track 1 will be encoded while track 2 is ripped, etc. This speeds up the overall rip of a CD by a little. If you're only encoding to Flac, then adding more encoders in parrallel probably wouldn't ever launch more than one. Doing MP3 or multiple encodings (via a third party tool like MAREO) might be different story. Unless your CD drive is screaming, or you PC is bogged down, you'll encode the previous track in Flac long before the current one finishes ripping.
-- JJZolx Jim ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=20188 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
