hifisteve said the following on 02/27/2006 09:21 PM: > Me again. > > Out of curiosity, I decided to try comparing an untouched WAV file > ripped using iTunes (ripped very fast, about x30) with the same track > as a FLAC file produced by Easy CD-DA. > > I have to say that despite being a hardened hifi nut of many years , I > couldn't reliably separate the WAV, FLAC and original CD through a £3k > CD player. > > As a result I've decided to save my sanity and do the lot as > uncompressed WAV files and invest a bit of money in some HD space.
Not a good idea. flac isn't just smaller, it also supports tagging which is, IMHO, essential for organising your collection. R. _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
