Mark Lanctot Wrote: > All good points, but note that the advantages and disadvantages you > mention are not related to the ripped format itself but rather to the > ripping tool used. You'll get no argument from me on that ... but the ripping tool seems to be important to the original poster, who said babi8987 Wrote: > If there are no differences in sound quality between these two formats, > then Windows Media Player would be perfered for ease of use.
If there was a ripping tool available (free or fee) that could make easy work of ripping FLAC while retrieving accurate tags and art, as effectively as WMP does, I'd be ripping in FLAC. The fact that WMP does this so well is not due to the quality of their ripping tool, I don't think, so much as to the data sources that Microsoft seems to have access to that others don't. -- Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2848 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=21940 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
