tingtong5;508907 Wrote: > And don't forget to replace your squeezeboxserver sox binary with the > v14.3 one, other wise you are still running the older binary that was > installed with squeezeboxserver, this might explain the high cpu load > that was mentioned. > > I am also in the process of trying to find the best sounding upsample > options (sox). Did anyone hear any difference between the old polyphase > method and the new rate method?
1) You get pretty recent sox with latest SqueezeServer, I think 14.2. Anyway, I do not remember serious change in CPU load 2) If I read the source code of sox correctly, 'polyphase' is just being emulated as 'rate -vb 95'.. -- michael123 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69454 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/ripping
