That certainly makes for interesting reading.

What it will mean, from my own view point, will be either more expensive 
electronics for cleaner outputs/less noise, or even more inferior hissy 
cheap playback devices to keep costs of manufacturing down in the consumer 
market.

I don't know if it has room for live production environments though like 
radio studios. In a live environment, there's already audio processing tools 
and mixing consoles to do the same thing, we don't need to re-invent the 
wheel there.

End user device control sure. As for recording labels.... there's no way you 
can remove the temptation for a half a dB of clipping more from a 
competitive market (unless we lived in a perfect world). But end user 
devices and distribution like iTunes, sure.... that makes good sense.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eliot Blennerhassett" <el...@blennerhassett.gen.nz>
To: <rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: [RDD] level normalization


> On 17/07/12 07:00, Fernando Della Torre wrote:
>> Hello folks!
>>
>> I know this question has been here before and some of you have a
>> particular point of view about normalization as a way to keep levels
>> (peaks) at the desired numbers for technical and security reasons, as
>> avoid clipping.
>>
>> But at the same time, once we use peak normalizing there will be a great
>> loudness difference between the songs, and it's not good when you have
>> no operador to bring the faders up and take them down.
>
> You mighty find this relevant
>
> http://music-loudness.com/PDFs/Loudness_Alliance_White_Paper_final_v1.pdf
>
> "The Music Loudness Alliance is a group of audio technical and
> production experts led by Florian Camerer and consists of Florian and
> audio engineers Eelco Grimm, Kevin Gross, Bob Katz, Bob Ludwig and
> Thomas Lund. Our mission is to inform and educate the audio community
> about Loudness Normalization and suggestions on how to implement it on
> various platforms"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rivendell-dev mailing list
> Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org
> http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev 

_______________________________________________
Rivendell-dev mailing list
Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org
http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev

Reply via email to