Hello, Le 21/06/2016 à 21:30, Fred Gleason a écrit : >> Well, my plan is to switch to Fedora 24, and from what I read on this >> list, it seems that, as it ships with MariaDB as a replacement for >> MySQL, I might run into a lot of trouble... with the additional fact >> that the default storage engine is InnoDB. And I seem to remember that >> this engine is not well supported either by Rivendell. > > Just curious: why Fedora and not RHEL 7 (or one of free clones > thereof)? FWIW, I’ve been developing Rivendell on CentOS 7 for a year > now (with MariaDB). No problems found. > > Cheers!
Well, my bad, I thought MariaDB would have been an issue at all. Thanks
for clarifying.
As for Fedora's choice, well... from the beginning (the earliest
download of Rivendell I can find on the server is 2.2.0, but I'm sure I
started with an even older version, so was my Fedora distrib at the
time), it has always worked very well. So... I kept it :)
Thanks for the info !
Hoggins!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Rivendell-dev mailing list Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
