[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796908#action_12796908
]
Peter Firmstone commented on RIVER-325:
---------------------------------------
>From river dev mail list:
Patrick Wright wrote:
> This sounds like a good direction to go in. I think that having the
> code throughout rely more on lookup methods like getRegistrar() could
> make certain types of testing easier--don't need to set up the
> infrastructure for socket-based testing if you can mock or stub the
> getRegistrar() method, for example.
Indeed, that would be nice. We could also decide that a LookupLocator is
nothing more than a specialized URI for finding a Registrar, deprecate all
implementation details, and provide a (configurable) factory to all subsystems
that need to bootstrap via a known Registrar.
> An important question will be how to make any such changes backwards
Indeed! Maybe including a URI based factory will provide us with more room to
maneuver.
Gr. Sim
> LookupLocator is missing ways to specify SocketFactory
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RIVER-325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-325
> Project: River
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: net_jini_discovery
> Reporter: Sim IJskes
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LookupLocator.java.patch
>
>
> LookupLocator has no way to specify a SocketFactory.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.