On Jan 4, 2007, at 10:59 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 1/4/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yep
On Jan 4, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> You might consider a JIRA component called "web site and
> infrastructure" that covers several categories of non-code issues.
>
I have prepared a patch to the web site doing mostly s/STATUS/JIRA,
but also
expressing what seems to be the consensus view that all significant
code or
doco changes should be tracked via JIRA tickets.
I'd hardly call it a consensus view.
That ticket should
logically be opened under a component such as Craig describes
above. Any
objections to my creating a JIRA component called "web site and
infrastructure"?
None whatsoever.
In harmony, we have one called "contibutions" that make it easy to
see what external "bulk" contirbutions have been offered... If
people like that, maybe you should make that too...
geir
Phil
