That's a great idea! See http://www.paremus.com. :-D
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Dennis Reedy <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Jul 3, 2009, at 1230PM, Sam Chance wrote: > > Dennis Reedy wrote: >> >> "Forget about OSGi for now, its a red herring for River moving out of >> incubation, and frankly a bit of noise that produces the same reaction >> every >> time it is posted. This is not to say the each technology (combined or >> separate) does not have its merits/issues, its just time to move on. ..." >> >> I agree with the last phrase of the last sentence. But it's remarkable how >> differently we collectively disagree with what "...moving on..." means! To >> some, "moving on" means embracing OSGi, particularly distributed OSGi >> (D-OSGi). To others, it means treating OSGi as orthogonal to Jini/River. >> > > Moving on simply means making forward progress with the project. IMO, the > best way to do that is to continually publish releasees, and build on what > we already have (which btw is an excellent and proven technology [1]). > > Perhaps the best way for you to move forward with OSGi & River, is to > develop a POC that combines OSGi & River, and demonstrate the benefits and > issues that your work addresses. > > Dennis > > [1] This of course does not mean it cant be improved :) > > -- Sam Chance 443-694-5293 (m) 410-694-0240 x108 (o)
