We would need to add a Configuration parameter to the LL constructor. I would recommend waiting till after the first release to do this, as the release cycle is close to complete. I don't have any opinion about what the configuration itself should look like; there are many here who are far more familiar with best practices around configuration.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Peter Firmstone <[email protected]> wrote: > Any suggestions where it should be in the configuration Pat? > > If we can add it without changing the Public API we should probably do it? > > Cheers, > > Peter. > > > > Patrick Wright wrote: >> >> Wouldn't low-level configuration details like this normally be >> provided in Jini via Configuration, rather than the constructor? >> >> Either way, I would recommend not changing (or extending) any >> top-level public APIs at this point until a release is made. >> >> Patrick >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Sim IJskes - QCG <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> any objections to inclusion of a constructor in LookupLocator to specify >>> a >>> socket factory? >>> >>> Gr. Sim >>> >>> >> >> > >
