Yes I do too,
Some of these seem to report time differences, but they appear equal, I
might change the resolution of the seconds to ms or something, to see
what the actual differences are.
Jonathan Costers wrote:
Did you try to run the servicediscovery category? I now get 15 test
failures consistently ... see attached report.
2010/8/30 Peter Firmstone <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
I've noticed that among the tests there are inconsistencies
related to RemoteEvent's, sometimes more events than expected are
recieved (multiple of two) and other time no event is received
when expected. I'll post some detailed test results later today.
Peter Firmstone wrote:
Are there any details, I can't seem to replicate it?
As I get time this week, it might take a little longer, but
I'll be working from a known stable state, slowly adding the
changes, until I discover the failure.
The issue seems to be Event based, as are the other issues
that are occurring.
Regards,
Peter.
[java] -----------------------------------------
[java]
[java] # of tests started = 497
[java] # of tests completed = 497
[java] # of tests skipped = 22
[java] # of tests passed = 497
[java] # of tests failed = 0
[java]
[java] -----------------------------------------
[java]
[java] Date finished:
[java] Tue Aug 31 03:38:24 EST 2010
[java] Time elapsed:
[java] 15780 seconds
[java]
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 291 minutes 59 seconds
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Jonathan Costers wrote:
OK, this one is ligitimate ...
The changes that were committed yesterday apparently
cause a single QA test
to fail:
[java] com/sun/jini/test/spec/
lookupdiscovery/MulticastMonitorAllChange.td
[java] Test Failed: Test Failed:
com.sun.jini.qa.harness.TestException:
change failed -- waited 870 seconds (14 minutes) -- 3
change event(s)
expected, 0 change event(s) received
Note that this QA run did not include
"servicediscovery" nor any other new
test categories.
The same tests were run as were run when the QA run
(build #1) passed
yesterday.
Any chance this can get some more attention?
IMHO, getting this fixed is our top priority right now.
I agree with the priority within River, but I am spending
the next few hours on something even higher priority -
going ceramic painting with a friend. I'll check the
mailing list when I get back. If nothing else happens,
I'll look into it this afternoon or evening.
If you have time, could you check whether it is a solid
failure or intermittent?
Patricia
