On 09/01/2010 08:06 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 9/1/2010 9:04 AM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 09/01/2010 05:05 PM, Jonathan Costers wrote:
OK, looks like we have agreement.
I'll try to at least initiate my proposal later today.
Thanks
Jonathan
Can we add that we vote before merging, after a peer review, and provide
a quick path for securityfixes on the trunk?
I'm not sure that the quick path criterion should be
security/not-security. Some of Peter's security work seems to me to be
complicated enough that it should go through a peer review before
merging. On the other hand, as Jonathan has suggested in another e-mail,
a separate branch may be overkill for a very simple change. A fix may be
urgent for other reasons than security.
Indeed, could we agree on a quick poll on the list for an urgent and/or
trivial fix. And an absolute requirement to have a working test after a
commit?
Gr. Sim
