On Tuesday 05 of October 2010 16:36:47 Gregg Wonderly wrote: > On 10/1/2010 12:38 PM, Michal Kleczek wrote: > > When I think about it some more - the below idea is not enough and we > > need a more general solution. > > How about class annotation not being a String but rather an object... I > > have to give it some more thought. > > There are been some thought and discussion about doing this. It is > possible, but the problem becomes that if you send an object with the > annotation, then how does the receiver unmarshall that object? Is that > object something that everyone knows about ahead of time?
My line of thought was - yes. It would have to be something similar to ProxyTrust - a factory to receive an Unmarshaller. I haven't really given it enough thought. But I am more and more convinced that doing that at the higher (proxy preparation) level - as I described it earlier - could actually be enough. Michal
