On Tuesday 12 of October 2010 16:13:14 Sim IJskes - QCG wrote: > On 10/12/2010 04:10 PM, Michal Kleczek wrote: > > On Tuesday 12 of October 2010 16:04:41 Sim IJskes - QCG wrote: > >> On 10/12/2010 03:39 PM, Michal Kleczek wrote: > >>> Or your code is signed with PGP - but I don't have a PGP verifier > >>> installed. Is it possible for you to provide me with third party PGP > >>> verifier code that in turn is signed with a standard X509 certificate? > >> > >> Why PGP? The PKI is the same. The CA's signing domain related > >> certificates are creating the inflexibility. > > > > Exactly... Hierarchical CAs are inflexible - that's why PGP (or SPKI) :) > > Strange reasoning. I'm my own CA. Whats the problem?
Your CA certificate is self-signed. How can I trust it? Is it possible o build a chain of trust like in SPKI? Michal
