Greg Trasuk wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 21:26, Benson Margulies wrote:
I've abandoned any ideas of continuing the Jini Surrogate Architecture
implementation, since I haven't been able to satisfy the code provenance
rules, despite the code being released under the Apache License 2.0 and
covered by a Patent Non-Assertion Covenant.
I'm completely not up to speed on this, but if legal gave you a frown,
I guess that's that.
For what it's worth, I've begun a clean-room implementation of Surrogate
starting from the spec, although I make no promises as to how quickly it
will proceed. I'm curious - should I start committing with the
in-progress code or wait til there's something approaching a working
module? Personally I'd prefer committing as we go, since (a) I'm much
happier with code in version control and (b) people might be able to
give opinions and assistance.
I'd like to help, and I think I'm qualified in terms of having never
looked at any code implementing the Jini Surrogate Architecture.
Patricia
