On 12/12/2010 06:37 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
Suggestion:

## Older sources
We do not actively search and reformat source files
that are not formatted according to this convention.

When a coder edits an older source file some reason (e.g. bug fixes or
feature additions), he/she should reformat the file according to these
specs.  He/she should commit the reformatting separately, so as to
separate reformatting changes from actual code changes.

I've reread the thread, and i have to agree with Christopher.

Reformatting a whole class in order to fix a small bug, doesn't feel right. I would just reformat the method or just around the bug.

When we limit ourselfs to a small reformat footprint, a inbetween commit doesn't add that much. At least IMHO.

I'm begging for wisdom here. Maybe we should write:

"If the reformatting involves a large part of the code, a clearly labeled 'reformatting' commit in between is recommended. Keeping your reformatting changes limited, reduces the change of merging conflicts by your fellow committers."

Did i find the right words?

Gr. Sim

Reply via email to