On Aug 17, 2009, at 5:14 PM, Mark Brouwer wrote:
Well actually that seems OK with me assuming that the SDM also has a registration with LUS-2. The SDM implementation does remove all instances associated with LUS-1 from the lookup cache when LUS-1 is discarded, but if the service is also registered with LUS-2 it will maintain in the view provided by the lookup cache.
There is a subtle but important issue here. If LUS-1 and LUS-2 are both active and LUS-2 can see the service advertisement from the LUS-1 machine, it will continue to advertise that service, even though the LUS-1 machine is unreachable from the client.
You said the LUS-1 machine (and thus associated services) was unreachable. Was that only from the clients perspective, or from the LUS-2 machines perspective as well?
Gregg Wonderly
