David Welton wrote:
The package name is 'Rivet'. It looks to me an arguable choice
unless the authors had in mind some sort of major reorganization
of the rivet commands. 'Rivet' (the package) provides 2 other
(undocumented ?) sets of commands: a simple cryptographic
system (a data obfuscation method ?) and a set of improved
list objects manipulation methods inspired by Tclx.
I don't even know if the code for these module is tested.
As far as I'm concerned, you can change the name. If anyone squawks,
we'll know that they didn't like it. But they should probably be on
this list in any case...
Rivetlib!
At one point in time, my idea was a minimalistic core, with lots of
readily available extensions. I don't think that's the wisest course
of action these days. Who cares about saving a few bytes.
yes, I agree
My opinion is that coming up with a 1_0 release that
compiles only for apache1.x is not a option anymore.
I think that's a sensible point of view. It would look a little bit
ridiculous. Let's call it 2.0 :-)
you've been selling used cars lately! :-) Rivet0.6 for apache1, Rivet2
for apache2,
Rivet2 for apache1:-< what an headache!
It sounds ridiculous but I thought of the same thing. After all it makes
life
easier to whom have to pick the right version of the module...let put it
in this way
-- Massimo
-- M
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
