> Here is small patch which replaces questionable (ugly ?) > Rivet_IsRivetFile function,
Definitely ugly, no question about it. > with cleaner equivalent. > It compiles fine for me. > Please review and test. Looks good to me! Massimo writes: > is there any tricky reason > (that we may be overlooking) for adopting the basic method > of scanning the whole file name in order to extract the > file type? Nope. The Apache2 code is pretty messy. The 1.3 code does pretty much everything correctly, and should be used as an example. -- David N. Welton http://www.welton.it/davidw/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
