Hello, Massimo !
> Having just apache-2 to take care of would give much more
> freedom to the development and simplify the tests.
>
> David, you're the policy maker here, what do you think?
> Maybe 1_0 is stable enough to be the final release for
> apache1.x?
>
>  -- Massimo
I disagree. I think we should support  apache-1.3.x version, as long
as it will be used.
And it will be used, because apache-1.3.x is the only version of
apache that has been properly audited for security holes, and spent
enough time in world wide production to be considered sort of
reliable.
 I have nothing against neither  apache2, nor by against folks who are
using or developing it  but here is my short list of contras:
-- first and most important - apache2 is a bad known by its api
changes which break backward compatibility with in  apache2 itself,
just recall apache 2.0 - apache 2.2 switch.
-- second introduction of this threading stuff - very questionable
from my point of view, of course there are some benefits on platforms
with expensive process creation, but on unix - it just makes things
much more complicated, threading support varies between different
common unixes greatly.
What i am thinking about is to make rivet so called "apr-centric" not
"apache-centric" - most of action code should be redone using apr and
tcl functions and made apache independent, leaving apache dependent
bits as thin as it will be possible.  IMHO 2.0-2.2 apache API breakage
was not the last one :)  I dont want to be dependant on it in the
future.


Regards Valery.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to