Hello, Massimo ! Dont worry, i am quite happy with svn. But here are the important moments: 1. Mercurial has pretty good svn interaction set of tools - otherwise i would not be bothered. 2. Mercurial keeps all history locally - it means i dont need internet connection to browse svn history, or commit my local changes - which is probably most important for me. 3.Due to some constraints - lack of time, lazyness, etc, i can have periods of inactivity, which always ends up the same - i am spending much time going through long "svn diff", trying to recall where did i finish, and what was actually finished. With mercurial i have a set of local commits, with their commit messages (which is invaluable). Think of mercurial as about tool, which can simplify some things, not the svn replacement.
Regards Valery. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
