My first impression, I like "wondrous" best. It's a huge improvement over what we have now.
On 11/7/11 3:48 AM, "Massimo Manghi" <[email protected]> wrote: >On 11/06/2011 08:58 PM, Jeff Lawson wrote: >> The first link seems to be bad. I think this is the URL you intended: >> http://people.apache.org/~mxmanghi/wondrous/index.html >> > >true, clumsy cut and paste. > >> I actually like the "wondrous" best, because the red theme nicely >> complements the logo. However, some might see it as having too much? >> >Initially I chose 'wondorous' for the same reason: it looked like it had >character, but the more I looked at it the more I feel like it could be >too much after a while. > > >> The "xhtml10" and "a_bit_boxy" designs look too generic. >> >> > >they are, as I said, but they have the good characteristic of being >balanced. Something more could be done by replacing the graphics with >some picture that might allude to the project name. I briefly looked for >a picture representing something like a riveted part of a building or >ship or even airplane (that would be a twofold reference to both Rivet >and Flightaware...), something the could be suggestive of organization, >strength and robustness....I found none of them.... > >thanks for expressing your thoughts > > -- Massimo > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
