I have to check the code out and see how consistently those symbols
were used in the parser. The Tcl implementation of the parser (not
relevant for the module, probably introduced for testing purposes) needs
to know what the tags are. Your objection is sensible, even though, as
Jeff said, Rivet is not unique in the choice of using the <? sequence
for its own purposes.
-- Massimo
On 2012-07-23 10:20, Nagarajan Chinnasamy wrote:
Thanks Jeff. Thats definitely a way out. This will help me from
deleting the <?xml line whenever the .rvt page is saved by tools like
Amaya.
It would be great if we can make it a run-time configuration through
directives than a compile time option. Reasonable to expect?
Best Regards,
Nagu.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Jeff Lawson <[email protected] [10]>
wrote:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
