Hi Massimo, I tested your 2.2.2 patched and I don't see the SEGV anymore. I will do more test over the next days for so far it's looking good.
Thanks Brice. On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Massimo Manghi <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you Brice, > > the patch plus some extra tests on the page_aborting flag were committed > and the whole code is now at > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tcl/rivet/branches/2.2 > > -- Massimo > > > On 05/05/2015 01:35 PM, Brice Hamon wrote: > >> Hi Massimo, >> >> Yes I will. I am up to my neck with my release and did not have one >> minute to investigate the problem. >> Once I am free I will work to identify this problem. >> Thanks >> Brice. >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:51 AM, Massimo Manghi <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi, I'm still exchanging patches and test results with James, but I >> will commit the current development status to branches/2.2 and >> trunk/ because I feel I'm not too far from fixing the long running >> bug #57501. >> >> I found another sore point in the child process exit handler where >> the Rivet channel could be unregistered several times (one for each >> virtual host) whereas the Rivet Channel is now unique per child >> process unless SeparateChannels is on. This condition is now handled >> consistently. >> >> I wonder if this could be the culprit for the segfaults Brice was >> observing during his tests. Brice, when I commit this stuff in >> branches/2.2 would you give it a try? Thanks >> >> >> -- Massimo >> >> >>
