Hi Harald
the operation was done last Saturday and I decided to patch the current
status of 2.2 back to r1702115 and then I committed those changes
(obviously after branches/2.3 was copied). I could have made a 2.2
branch from it but that would have made the branch history a bit
contorted. In this way there's a linear discontinuity in that the branch
was rolled back to a previous state, but everything was done from that
point on is still there in its history available from 'svn log'.
-- Massimo
On 11/30/2015 11:54 AM, Harald Oehlmann wrote:
Couldn't you branch where all was still together and than better make
foreward commits ?
I use svn each day but with the great TourtoiseSVN user interface, so
don't know about command line interface.
Harald
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
