Hi George
On 05/28/2018 10:52 AM, Georgios Petasis wrote:
Dear Massimo,
The advantages for me, even for a read-only mirror are:
1) It can be placed in github. This will add some small visibility. It
is just another place that can direct to apache rivet through its
readme.md file.
good point, but shouldn't it enable us to move on to github anyway,
without asking Apache to open a read-only repository?
2) Perhaps it would be easier for some to monitor, fork, do some fixes
and generate a pull request. (perhaps :-))
I would like also a bug tracking feature, but I see none of the mirrored
projects having the "Issues" tab.
Yes, we are a tiny project compared to other Apache projects, but I
think we should try... :-)
George
I'd like to have an insight into Rob Maris words. How different is
'forking' a repository from 'cloning' it, the usual way we do with git
or fossil?
-- Massimo
Firma il tuo 5 x mille all’Università di Parma e aiuta così i nostri studenti
che vogliono realizzare un’esperienza di studio all’estero – Indica 00308780345
nella tua denuncia dei redditi.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
