John Horne wrote: > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:19:44 +0000 > From: John Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Rkhunter-users] Reguarding bad hashes on RH based > distros with SELinux enabled > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 12:59 -0800, Mark Ness wrote: > >> Not to sound impatient, but is there any word from RH devel about >> updates to fix this problem? >> I know you said before that Fedora was supposed to provide an update >> for selinux, and they either changed their minds or haven't gotten >> around to it yet (sorry I don't have the thread to qyote but >> I'm sure you recall mentioning "something" along those lines). >> >> > The problem seems to have been fixed in FC6, but for FC5 it has been > released in selinux-policy-2.3.7-4.fc5. At present FC5 runs > selinux-policy-2.3.7-2.fc5, so it is probably still in updates-testing. > > I have attached a small patch which you can apply to rkhunter 1.2.9 to > see if it helps. > > > > John. > > Thanks for the reply John. Unfortunately, the attachment didn't make it through,
>A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >Name: rkh.patch >Type: text/x-patch >Size: 580 bytes >Desc: not available but that's OK, since It seems to be fixed in FC6 and I plan to move on to 6 soon anyway and I'm running 1.2.8 cron and 1.2.9 manually with setenforce 0 to verify the hashes ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rkhunter-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users
