Hi, On Thursday 08 September 2011, meik michalke wrote: > i would suggest using roxygen from here on, because it's harder to forget > to update the docs if they're in the same file, and it automatically does > some checking. i used Rd2roxygen to initially convert the existing docs. > it's rather pointless to repeat that agein and again ;-)
yes, fully agreed. I was looking into how "roxygenization" would be added to our maintainance scripts, but while testing, I stumbled across some things that made me wonder. One thing is that rk.record.plot-docs apparently got missing in the conversion (I hope these were the only ones). Another thing that I just noted is that the generated pages appear to lack a "usage" section, which is pretty confusing, esp. on pages listing multiple functions. Also there may be some more subtle issues. For instance, on the roxygenized variant of the rk.misc-page, the "Details" for rk.rename.in.container() have moved into the "Description"-section for the whole page. Is there anything we can do about those issues? Regards Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Malware Security Report: Protecting Your Business, Customers, and the Bottom Line. Protect your business and customers by understanding the threat from malware and how it can impact your online business. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427462/
_______________________________________________ RKWard-devel mailing list RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel
