Hi Meik, On Saturday 09 March 2013, meik michalke wrote: > Am Freitag, 8. März 2013, 12:25:20 schrieb t...@users.sf.net: > > Adjust for boolean properties (here: visible) being returned as bool. > > For clarity also specify getBoolean() as getter. > > getBoolean() does require RKWard >= 0.6.0, doesn't it? i'll adjust the > requirements of the plugin then.
Oh. Actually RKWard > 0.6.0. I simply had not thought of this. I've changed it to a different solution, now, which should be both backwards and forwards compatible. While starting to look at the subset plugin (one of the things still on the list for 0.6.1), I found it was broken by this change: http://www.mail-archive.com/rkward-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01940.html (and it seems, in that mail, I forgot to mention the "visible" and "enabled" properties, which are also booleans). > if it's ok for all external plugins to require at least 0.6.0, i'd toggle > the "guess.getter" switch in all of them, so they'll try to use the newer > getter functions automatically. Again, this would be RKWard > 0.6.0, and so anything the like should definitely wait. I simply wasn't thinking. Regards Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ RKWard-devel mailing list RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel
