2014-11-10 15:37 GMT-03:00 Thomas Friedrichsmeier <thomas.friedrichsme...@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>: > Hi all! > > So we just hit revision number 5000 in SVN, yesterday. Let's celebrate this by > getting ready to switch to git ;-) > > As discussed, the repository is split into two (actually three, but one of > them is just an archive of our JSS article). The main repository is at > g...@git.kde.org:scratch/tfry/rkward-svn-import.git > or (anonymously) at > git://anongit.kde.org/scratch/tfry/rkward-svn-import.git > A simple web view at > http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=scratch/tfry/rkward-svn-import.git > Of course this is just a temporary place for the purpose of testing. Which is > what I would like to ask you to do. > > Things look pretty good to me, but I'm no expert in looking at git branch > visualizations, and it would really be great, if the experts (Jeremy, Nicolás) > could give this a short look. One thing that may be particularly touchy is the > switchover between SVN branches we did on December, 30, 2007 (SVN revs 2289 > and 2290). Here, SVN trunk was _moved_ to branches/release_branch_0.4.9/, and > branches/KDE4_port/ was moved to trunk. > > What svn2git made of this looks pretty sane to me, but again, I'd like to be > sure. One detail that is worrying me, here, is that svn2git deemed it > necessary to create the two tags > backups/development/port_to_kde4@2290 > (3ad98a97b114510d97061e06fbde8247453d40ee) > backups/master@2289 > (bd1394fd635d0203666621955010bb7646284c15) > These are lightweight tags and can't be pushed. Would these be important to > keep? > > In case it is relevant, a summary of the key ingredients of the conversion: > Getting SVN repo: rsync -av svn.code.sf.net::p/rkward/code rkwardsvn > Conversion rules: > http://sourceforge.net/p/rkward/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/rkward/scripts/svn2git_rules?format=raw > > The second repository is for external plugins. It is much easier, since this > only ever was a single branch, and never had any tags. It's temporary place is > https://github.com/tfry-git/rkward-external-plugins . Questions regarding this > one: > - Where exactly should this end up? I think it should be group-owned, somehow. > - Meik, do you recall, whether there is anything left in rk.subset that we did > not merge into the main distribution? Can this be deleted? > - Also, Meik, could you add some README to the "stuff" directory? This is > supposed to be the bikeshed for stuff that is not really something, but should > not be thrown away, either?
I was at a conference (and helping with its organization too!) this whole weekend so I had no time to even read your emails. I'll take a look at your conversion now. By the way, just to make sure: was your SVN repository always SVN, or was rkward ever in CVS? -- Nicolás ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ RKWard-devel mailing list RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel
