On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:07:10 +0300 Emil Sirbu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eu folosesc DERIVE in loc de COUNTER. La resetarea valorilor nu se mai > ingreagistreaza acel "overflow". (pe care poti sa-l controlezi setand > un MAX). Singura problema e la un reset cand se inregistreaza un 0 > dar asta nu-i asa o problema. > hmm: Internally, derive works exactly like COUNTER but without overflow checks. So if your counter does not reset at 32 or 64 bit you might want to use DERIVE and combine it with a MIN value of 0 Din ce scrie aici cica in situatia mea e mai bun COUNTER decat DERIVE, oricum o sa il incerc si vad ce iese -- Mihai Voica _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list RLUG@lists.lug.ro http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug
