On Mon, 5 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 17:15:29 +0200 (EET)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains
>
>
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Andrei Pelinescu - Onciul wrote:
>
> > > si iptables -t filter -A INPUT -d xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -j ACCEPT
> > ^^^^^ trebuie tot FORWARD (INPUT e numai
> > pentru ce vine pentru hostul local).
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^ io nu te cred ... tu te crezi ?
eu testai, si trebuie intr-adevar FORWARD, era eroarea mea
citat :
[...]
The tables are as follows: filter This is the default table, and
contains the built-in
chains INPUT (for packets coming into the box itself),
FORWARD (for packets being routed
through the box),
____________________________________
Catalin Braica
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 409-452-4161 Work: 405-141-3496
http://www.edulib.ro/~catalin/
---
Send e-mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe rlug' to
unsubscribe from this list.
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Gabriel Mihalache
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Paul Dorneanu [root]
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Bogdan Eugen Daja
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Paul Dorneanu [root]
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Tarhon-Onu Victor
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Paul Dorneanu [root]
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains 092.853.212
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Catalin Braica
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Andrei Pelinescu - Onciul
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains ionut.spirlea
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Catalin Braica
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains ionut.spirlea
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Tarhon-Onu Victor
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Andrei Pelinescu - Onciul
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains ionut.spirlea
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Florin Andrei
- [rlug] procmail A.Berdan
- [rlug] Re: procmail Camelia Nastase
- [rlug] Re: procmail A.Berdan
- [rlug] Re: procmail teo
- [rlug] Re: procmail A.Berdan
