Alea sunt topuri pt idiotii care nu stiu ce e aia linux sau pt manageri. RedHat e in urma pt ca e plin de buguri si de cod experimental (gcc 2.96 rings some bells about this) iar distributii bine ingrijite cum ar fi Slackware sau Mandrake nici nu sunt pomenite acolo. Atat timp cat orice distributie de linux e o ciorba mai mult sau mai putin organizata eu nu dau doi bani pe nici una. Oricine poate face o distributie, se pare ca SuSE stie sa isi si lege pachetele intre ele si vine cu o scula de configurare destul de buna pt un incepator sau unul de nivel mediu. Sa nu uitam ca pt max 10% din noi de aici Linux nu reprezinta decat kernelul si restul e alegerea noastra.
Stefan "hack the startup scripts" L. On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 12:23:59PM +0200, Teodor Cimpoesu wrote: > > http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-7320505.html > > An analysis by D.H. Brown Associates ranked SuSE's version 7.2 at the top of > the heap, with a "good" rating. Red Hat 7.1 was a notch behind, but still > earning a "good." Caldera International's OpenLinux 3.1 and Turbolinux Server > 6.5 managed only "above average," but still ranked better than Caldera's > UnixWare, the study found. > > > -- teodor > --- > Send e-mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe rlug' to > unsubscribe from this list. > -- Stefan Laudat CCNA & CCAI ------------- Sex hasn't been the same since women started enjoying it. -- Lewis Grizzard --- Send e-mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe rlug' to unsubscribe from this list.
