Da man plus ca SCO afirma ca s-au copiat tehnologii. Ori ca vezi tu 80 de linii de cod asemanatoare care contin un loop clasic nu cred ca e o tehnologie in sine. Sa arate bucati de cod asemenea ce reprezinta tehnologia copiata.
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Claudiu Cismaru wrote: > > Salut, > > Nu stiu cati dintre voi au citit articolul, de aceea postez > So far: > > "Another proviso is that Bill Claybrook found 80 lines of code common to > both the Unix and Linux code the SCO-Caldera people showed. Considering > how much code there is in the Linux kernel and the GNU/Linux operating > system, 80 lines of common code seems insignificant. Moreover, Bill > Claybrook was not able to determine if the 80-lines of code might have > been copied from Unix to Linux or from Linux to Unix -- nor does he > report the source or author of these 80-lines of possibly purloined > code. > > That is because SCO showed no evidence regarding these issues. Bill > Claybrook does not go off jumping to conclusions about the SCO code > show and tell event." > > Tot story-ul la: > > http://mozillaquest.com/Linux03/ScoSource-20-CodeReview_Story01.html > > -- > Claudiu > GPG Key: http://maya.cnixs.com/~claudiu/claudiu.gpg > > ---------------------------- Mihai RUSU Disclaimer: Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of any company, unless otherwise specifically stated.
