Ia uite ce zic astia: http://www.messagewall.org/features.html#virus Nu zic ca nu ai avea dreptate, insa eu am folosit definitiile date de OAV in Messagewall. Rezultatele au fost peste asteptari.
Sorin >>Si daca omul vrea sa fie prevazator? ;-) >> >>Incearca Razvane OpenAntivirus www.openantivirus.org + Messagewall >>(www.messagewall.org) Face Acelasi lucru ca RAV, insa mai bine. >> >> >> >> >> >Uite ce scrie la ei pe site: > >What we currently have is a set of toys to play with - nothing we would >consider using in a production environment (or at least not without >prior extensive testing). All these toys are in a very early, mostly >pre-alpha state. No one serious about the security of their systems will >honestly use OAV as the only means to protect them. It's just made >public for testing and further development. > >Chiar crezi ca-si face treaba mai bine ca RAV? OAV are o rata de >detectie de vreo 10% din ce am vazut eu. Antivirusii care isi fac treaba >se duc peste 99%. > >Eu (si cei care il fac) cred ca OAV mai are de crescut inainte de a >putea fi folosit in productie. > >Lars > > >--- >Detalii despre listele noastre de mail: http://www.lug.ro/ > > > > > --- Detalii despre listele noastre de mail: http://www.lug.ro/
