On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:25:39AM +0200, George Mihalcea wrote: > http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/11/11/HNmsassault_1.html > > E de pe bugtraq, poate unii il stiu deja. > Si comentariile de pe bugtraq sunt interesante, de exemplu de ce compara > Steve Ballmer windowsul 2000 si windowsul 2003 cu red hat 6, care e ceva > mai vechi totusi... (oare la nivelul asta se ridica windowsul?) > > Sau alt comentariu: > "i guess the main argument against this joke is that an operating > system with 10 different web servers, 10 different mail servers, 10 > different ftp servers, 20 different window managers, 10 different > browsers, 20 different mail clients, and so on, and so on, will have > how many more bugs than a monolithic approach with 1 web server, > 1 mail server, 1 ftp server, etc... > > the numbers are not exact, but i guess this fact is what microsoft > will exploit. what really counts is numbers on deployed servers, not > bugs in software that very few use..."
bullshit tipic. redhat are fix un webserver, fix 2 mailservere (la redhat6 fix doar unul, apoi au bagat si postfix pe linga sendmail). citi ftpclients, windowmanagers, browsers si alte crapuri nu sunt atit de importante pentru securitatea unui server. important este cit de secure sunt serverele de pe server ;-) > > > > > --- > Detalii despre listele noastre de mail: http://www.lug.ro/ > -- ___ <o-o> Viorel ANGHEL <vang @ lug.ro> [`-'] -"-"- In Linux We Trust. --- Detalii despre listele noastre de mail: http://www.lug.ro/
