What 'kind' of cluster are you after? HiAv, Out-of-box scalability, Compute Intensive? I'd assume HiAv since you are considering Kimberlite. I am not aware of anyone running it for enterprise clustering... but then again.. I don't know of anyone running linux for enterprise HiAv clustering. Most of my linux customers are running compute clusters.
- jim On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 08:18:55 -0700 "Eric Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, I reached that conclusion sometime after I sent the mail mentioning RH9. > > So do you think RH7.3 and Kimberlite are ready for prime time? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: James Washer [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 8:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [RLUG] Opinions on Kimberlite? > > Very very few commercial clusters run on RHAS.. Most here in the US are > running RH73 > > - jim > > On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 08:28:33 -0700 > "Eric Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anybody have a strong opinion on Kimberlite clustering software? I'm > thinking of using a Linux/Kimberlite solution for my mission-critical cluster, but I > don't want to buy Red Hat Enterprise server. I'm thinking just the standard RH9 > distro, and I install Kimberlite myself. Thoughts? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > RLUG mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug > > > > > _______________________________________________ > RLUG mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug > _______________________________________________ > RLUG mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug > _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
