On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 05:59:16PM -0800, Todd A. Jacobs wrote: ... > offline because the individuals involved couldn't be trained to reply to > the list, no matter how hard I tried.
clearly it makes sense to use the Reply-To: in that situation. ... > > impossible. and... I believe there are other headers available > > (though not widely used/implemented) that are specifically designed > > for the functionality we're discussing. > > Now you've got me curious. What headers are we talking about? I've never looked into it because I don't really care. And, I don't think they're used, so it probably doesn't matter. I'm sure you could find them if you looked. I don't claim to be very knowledgeable about email headers and routing. I'm repeating arguments I've heard other more knowledgeable folks make when this topic has come up in other lists. (this topic seems to universally make people a little touchy. ;) I know for sure though that I prefer the Reply-To to be left alone. - Ben _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
