This question might be targeted more toward James, but what do people think about Linux on the Mainframe for deploying Linux? I'm looking at using zSeries machines to run various databases under Linux, since mainframes are often acclaimed for their i/o abilities.

Assuming money is no problem, what would be the reasoning behind going for a normal Linux server setup with fail over compared to using an underlying operating system such as zOS? What about a Linux server set up running UML or Xen versus zOS?

Factors that I can think of off hand is that adding more Linux servers is easier, and software compiled for i386/x86-64 would be far more common, but for the software I plan to run, a zOS port would certainly be available. Other things would be the physical labor involved: that is something that will always be limited. There are probably more people in the industry that know how to manage Linux servers than Linux on zOS. zOS is also a "blackbox", so an admin would have to rely on the vendor instead of training to fix a problem in some cases.

Any one else have thoughts?

_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug

Reply via email to