I would hope that , considering the small following we currently have,
that somehow we can work on gaining come cohesiveness. The linux
movement is hard enough to push forward without having internal fracturing.
Damon
Sebastian Smith wrote:
I understand fully -- it does have to do with laboratory facilities, or at
least lecture facilities. We have the same issues in hosting at UNR -- we
host through the Association of Computing Machinery's UNR student chapter.
That way we can use the facilities, while not maintaining direct relations
with the University.
- Sebastian
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Dennis Bagley wrote:
While rlug is a community entity with no (specified) allegiances Cathy
is not.
And there were some issues with TMCC admin about us using facilities on
campus
unless we were an officially sanctioned organization, blah, blah ad
nauseum.
So please, no need to take it personally - it's not against us, in fact
she had originally hoped
we could share some speakers.
Dennis
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 12:35 -0800, Sebastian Smith wrote:
I agree with core, yet fail to see how college politics or finances
facilitates the creation of a new LUG. After all, we are a community
entity with no allegiances. Is lack of laboratory facilities what she is
concerned about?
- Sebastian
_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
The quickest way to a man's heart really is through his stomach, because
then you don't have to chop through that pesky rib cage.
[info][add][mail]
J. Jacques,
_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
