Hi all,

This is a heads-up that I am about to do some significant package name
refactoring.  In a nutshell, all appearances of ...pror.reqif10... will
be replaced with ...reqif10.pror...

Here some background: Currently, the ProR ItemProviders cannot be
generated without errors, as for this to work, the model classes and
ItemProvider classes must have the same package names (short of the
trailing .provider).  It had been in the back of my mind to create a
custom template to fix this.

However, I discussed that with Stephan Eberle at EclipseCon, where he
pointed out that the trailing .provider can be modified through the
generator.  For instance, .provider can simply be changed into
.pror.provider, to give the providers a different package name.  This
seems to be a much more elegant solution, as it does not require custom
templates.  But for this to work, the beginning of the package names for
model and providers must still be identical.  By switching .pror and
.reqif, we can achieve this.

I plan on releasing this with 0.5.0.  Please be aware that this will
affect ALL presentations (including those not hosted at eclipse.org). 
Also, this may break the Hudson system, as Lukas, who usually maintains
it, is on vacation for a few days.

Best,

- Michael


-- 
*Michael Jastram*       +49 (162) 274 83 94     http://jastram.de
Geschäftsführer         Formal Mind GmbH        http://formalmind.com
Wissenschaftler         Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf
http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de
<http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/w/Michael_Jastram>
Vorsitzender    rheinjug e.V.   http://rheinjug.de
Project Lead    Eclipse Requirements Modeling Framework
http://eclipse.org/rmf

_______________________________________________
rmf-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rmf-dev

Reply via email to