I have been working to convert the TIGER data into a MYSQL database that uses spatial indexing. The advantage of this is the speed that spatial indexing gives you when searching. I was hoping that someone developing a mapping application would like to use this instead of the raw TIGER files. I am just trying to gauge if there would be any interest in having Roadster use MySQL to store TIGER data. If so, I would be interested in working with you to develop this database. If not, I am thinking about dropping the project to work on something that might be more useful, like finding a way to gather more point-of-interest data for use in mapping applications.

The Pros to using a MySQL database are: spatial indexing is very fast, MySQL is crossplatform, SQL is easy to work with and lots of developers have experience, MySQL can be used with many programming languages, if foreign country data ever becomes available, it will not be in TIGER format and will need converted anyhow.

The Cons to using a MySQL database are: Spatial Index creation is slow, Table sizes can get very large.

I am interested in your feedback,
s003apr
_______________________________________________
roadster mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/roadster

Reply via email to