I forgot... I'm using the following "rbh-du" performance fix:

diff --git a/src/robinhood/rbh_du.c b/src/robinhood/rbh_du.c
index 7853925..504ec26 100644
--- a/src/robinhood/rbh_du.c
+++ b/src/robinhood/rbh_du.c
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static lmgr_filter_t    parent_filter; /* same as 
entry_filter + condition on pa
  static bool_node_t      match_expr;
  static int              is_expr = 0; /* is it set? */

-static int disp_mask = ATTR_MASK_fullpath | ATTR_MASK_type | 
ATTR_MASK_blocks | ATTR_MASK_size;
+static int disp_mask = ATTR_MASK_type | ATTR_MASK_blocks | ATTR_MASK_size;
  static int query_mask = 0;

  typedef struct stats_du_t
@@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ static int list_content(char ** id_list, int id_count)
              if (rc)
                  return rc;

-            print_stats(ATTR(&root_attrs, fullpath), stats);
+            print_stats(ids[i].fullname, stats);
          }
      }



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
robinhood-support mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/robinhood-support

Reply via email to