Hi, I think the website looks pretty good. Great Work! Especially when we replace all those pretty people by even prettier robots :)
On the subject of Jekyll vs. Webgen, I don't have an oppinion. I think it is a matter of if someone is willing to do it. But then again, maybe when changing the layout, this would be a good point to switch the engine as well. A thing that was on my mind for a while though, is maybe to get a Rock logo. Cheers, Jakob > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Sylvain Joyeux > Sent: Freitag, 16. Januar 2015 14:13 > To: [email protected] > Cc: Tiago Cajahyba > Subject: [Rock-dev] Proposal for a Rock website redesign > > Cajahyba (from BIR) asked me to put online a redesign proposal for the Rock > website. I finally did so (sorry for the long time, Cajahyba !) > > Example front page > http://www.jhaampe.org/rock-redesign/ > > Example documentation page > http://www.jhaampe.org/rock- > redesign/documentation/introduction/overview.html > > Obviously, before getting into the full-fledged work, we would like to have > some feedback ... > > In addition, we were considering whether we should not use this to change > the website generation tool. I picked webgen at the time before it looked > really the best (given the constraint that one should be able to generate and > browse the documentation offline). These days, especially given that we are > now on github, jekyll took a lot of steam (and is IMO a lot better than > webgen). We would appreciate some thoughts on the matter as well ... > > Sylvain > _______________________________________________ > Rock-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dfki.de/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/rock-dev _______________________________________________ Rock-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.dfki.de/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/rock-dev
