Hello all Once upon a time, a few years ago, I had the idea of having a "base" version of orocos.rb without the "magic" stuff that makes the library hard to maintain, and was designed to make scripting "easier". The objective was to have a thinner, well-defined base for Syskit without the historical stuff. The planned name was 'runkit'.
As all "let's do a major migration", it never happened. The result is that orocos.rb and syskit are now being developed on branches (called transition-to-runkit) because I never had the time to start the process of mainlining that stuff. Anyways The changes on orocos.rb itself are rather minimal, but I'm seeing Christoph having problems that have probably been fixed on them. I would strongly suggest that you take the time to evaluate whether the branches "work for you" rather first. Syskit: I'm really not sure whether anyone at DFKI (or somewhere else on this email list ...) depends on Syskit. I would appreciate having some inputs about that. There are a LOT more changes there. Mostly bugfixes and new functionality related to robustness, but even though we're always trying to keep backward compatibility, it's hard for us to guarantee that noone was depending on a bug we've closed ;-) I'm throwing this on this forum to avoid having people duplicate effort (wink wink Christoph) and see what would be the best option from your perspective to move all that stuff to master. -- <https://www.tidewise.io/> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/tidewise> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqkA0F52ImGGVNORHx770Vg> Sylvain Joyeux CTO +55 21 3923 5048 Rua Santo Cristo, 70 | Santo Cristo Rio de Janeiro / RJ, Brasil
_______________________________________________ Rock-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.dfki.de/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/rock-dev
