On 31.01.2006, Daniel Stenberg wrote: > Hi
> I'm not at all fond of the BMP cache thing that was added the > other day. I think it bloats code, is complex and is the wrong > answer to the minor performance problems we might have when > loading WPS configs with large amounts of pics. > I'd rather see us move towards using a single BMP with "chop" > instructions for what to use. I'm with you here. There seems to be an additional area for gaining performance - it was reported that WPS loading on iPod is way faster than on iriver. The CPU speed is similar, so I can only imagine 2 possible causes: (1) The iriver ATA driver needs optimising. (2) The endian swap in fat.c. Regards, Jens
